Tuesday, March 6, 2012

The Paracelsus Paradigm

In a room distinctly brimming with quick wit, attentive detail, and an intoxicatingly captivating sense of humor, I recently found myself stifling my own laughter while observing a film shoot with Paracelsus Films.  Embracing a distinct comical undertone akin to Monty Python, alongside a provocative improvisational style, the three-man crew representing Paracelsus Films proceeded to set-up and shoot a sharply written and cleverly acted sketch, intended to be part of their original sketch-comedy film “How to Win the Internet: And Other Questionable Endeavors,” currently in-production.   This film is an especially collaborative and close-to-the-heart project for these filmmakers, who all recall warm and inspirational thoughts and nostalgia for sketch comedy groups and films such as Monty Python and Mystery Science Theater.   In joining the film shoot with Vincent C. Morreale, Paul Ezzy, and Dennis Hurley, it became abundantly clear that Paracelsus Films was driven by a poignantly sincere and thrillingly rare love for filmmaking. 


As I watched the film production unfold, immersing myself in the vividly collaborative atmosphere, I became engrossed with the original sketch itself as well as the wildly efficient production; Vincent Morreale simultaneously directing, operating the camera, and checking sound, while Paul Ezzy and Dennis Hurley aptly riffed with one another, exchanging a consistent rapid-fire of hilarity, providing the distinctly exciting production with nothing less than a palpably mesmerizing ambiance.   I soon found myself in a room flooded with laughter, pondering the possibilities of the final film.  Observing these filmmakers at work was comparable to taking refuge in the diegesis of an original Paracelsus film. With a visceral edge to their narratives, a stylistic swagger in the performances, and a spell-binding fluidity in their execution, these filmmakers embolden a sense of filmic tactility; thriving with a unique tone, an oscillation of energy, and a character-driven eccentricity. 
Although tackling a diverse variety of genres, films, and structures other than sketch comedy, the group emphasized their resilient passion for this latest endeavor.  Vincent Morreale,  the artistic director for Paracelsus films, passionately stressed that this current film production – “How to Win the Internet” - boiled down to a poetic simplicity, explaining candidly and genuinely that the film was “all about making funny sketches and coming together.” Morreale emphasized the way in which he worked and bonded with his fellow filmmakers and collaborators as a family; each of whom would gladly join to contribute to a film at a moment’s notice.  Paul Ezzy – an actor, writer, and the Director of Photography for Paracelsus Films – articulated his enthusiasm for comedic filmmaking and sketch comedy.  Dennis Hurley - a writer, actor and self-proclaimed “sketch-comedy addict” – specifically noted his love for older Jerry Zucker films, such as Kentucky Fried Movie and Top Secret!  Having been a member of multiple improvisational groups, including “Improv Boston,” Hurley spoke exuberantly about his love for sketch comedy. Dennis, who wrote, filmed and acted in his own satire of “The DaVinci Code” called “The Albino Code,” which subsequently went viral and secured him an appearance on The Daily Show in March of 2010, joked that he has “tried to win the internet” himself.  This inherently driven group of filmmakers that comprises Paracelsus Films effectively combines harmonious comical tastes, congruous visions, and curiously potent styles to create a sort of cinematic synergy.  This collaborative intertwining of engaging methods, honed styles and individual fortes alongside a shared embrace of humor and story-telling yields a uniquely affecting result; dynamic filmmaking. 


Whimsically balanced between joviality and a provocative determination, these film-makers are firmly rooted in an unmistakable passion for film-making.  Consistently producing with little or no funding, Paracelsus Films provokes the inevitable question that Independent film-makers, producers, and bigwig professionals often ask; how would a strikingly self-sufficient production crew thrive with an even slightly increased budget?  As a solo, independent film-maker myself, the enduring question resounds; how dynamically enhanced would the cinematic, visceral and narrative results of a self-sustained production crew be? This question enlivens an essential concept for film-makers, financiers, and producers alike; the impact of a fully-realized potential.  With a sense of profundity in their drive, a sharp poignancy in their collaboration, and a rarity in their efficiency, Paracelsus Films exemplifies the thrilling aptitude and subtle force of independent film.

If you’d like to gain a glimpse into some recent Paracelsus Films productions, you can check out their 2011 promotional reel here

If you’d like to learn more about Paracelsus Films, you can visit their website at http://www.paracelsusfilms.com/

Or sign up for their newsletters here

And if you would like to contribute to Paracelsus Films through their Indie Go Go site, you can do so here




Saturday, February 25, 2012

Intermission; Alex's 2012 Oscar Predictions


 Predicting the Oscars is like trying to psychoanalyze a rotary; it’s clear where some cars are entering, and it’s apparent where some are leaving, but in between is a confoundingly hap-hazard system of yielding, stopping, swerving, breaking, speeding, and honking.  It’s the modern-day labyrinth, the socially applicable maze, and the crossword puzzle of pauses, blanks, and multi-syllabic slurs.  It’s that damned Rubik’s Cube that’s all solved except for one side, that 51-card deck, and that game of boggle missing all the vowels. It’s the rotary of personality. Having said that, however, my view of the Oscars is as follows; during a trip to Puerto Rico, I watched a man drive into a rotary, swiftly pull over, park his car in a crevasse in the center, unbuckle his seatbelt, get out of his car, and simply walk away.  Now that is the Oscars, my friends, and that guy is the winner.  But who’d have guessed that? (Other than that guy).
Besides, how is a quasi-anonymous group of voters supposed to accurately represent the larger whole? Now I don't mean to spill my 'melodrama ink' all over this, but let's take a quick look; Kate Ward recently reported that "The Academy Awards chooses its winners based on the votes of a select group of Hollywood insiders” and continues to note that "According to a study conducted by The Los Angeles Times, the Academy, which boasts 5,765 members, is 94 percent Caucasian and 77 percent male.” Well My Oh My! Let's cut to a visual, shall we?

 


Let's clear something up; that film was amazing and worthy of praise, nominations, and wins...and the irony strikes my funny bone with a hammer. Ward also notes that “Only 14 percent of the Academy is younger than 50, and as for its minority voters: Only 2 percent are African-American, while 2 percent are Latino." The artistry of this industry is really becoming black and white, isn’t it? (Yeah that pun was terrible). In essence, we have a steaming crock-pot of film-makers, viewers, large sums of cash, bigger sums of investments, more film-makers, judges, judges who are also filmmakers, TV producers, rating necessities and objectives, maybe a slightly bias group of voters, and yes...a sincere celebration for the art-form. This can more aptly be described as 'Showbiz.' 
This profoundly nostalgic year of the Oscars also stands out among many others for me – not because the films are better, or worse, but rather because there is a greater gap in my predicted winners and my personal favorites.  In other words, the films I believe and predict will win differ entirely from the films I believe should win.  And so I struggle to divorce my emotions from my logic (I suppose a more universally existential issue concisely micro-managing my struggle to accurately predict the Oscars). I first look objectively at the set of nominees and predict who I believe will win, taking into account the film/performance itself alongside the political foreplay.  I then begin to feel a sense of discontent bubbling in my stomach, rising into my chest like heartburn, gripping my throat and forcing me to realize my distinct frustration; that my personal favorites - the films that have moved me, awed me, and sincerely stood out over all the others - are almost completely different from my predictions, all across the board.  And so; I predict, I reject, and subsequently accept.  The following are my logical predictions, with a few un-movable, prideful, hubris-stricken, desired outcomes over-shadowing my deductive and objective predictions (maybe more than not!).  As this task of predicting the outcome of a ceremony that amalgamates talent, blurry politics, and an expert utilization of surprise and shock in the name of publicity and marketing becomes slightly more complex, apparently so do my transitions…here are the predictions!

Best Picture – The Artist
Best Director – Michel Hazanavicius
Best Lead Actor – George Clooney
Best Lead Actress – Viola Davis
Best Supporting Actor – Christopher Plummer
Best Supporting Actress - Octavia Spencer
Best Original Screenplay – Midnight in Paris
Best Adapted Screenplay – The Descendants
Best Cinematography – The Tree of Life
Best Editing – The Artist
Best Original Score – The Artist
Best Original Song – Man or Muppet
Best Makeup – The Iron Lady
Best Art Direction – The Artist
Best Costume Design – Hugo
Best Visual Effects – Rise of the Planet of the Apes
Best Sound Mixing – War Horse
Best Sound Editing – War Horse
Best Foreign Language – A Separation
Best Short Live Action – The Shore
Best Animated Short – The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore
Best Documentary Short – The Tsunami and the Cherry Blossom
Best Documentary Feature – Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory
Best Animated Feature – Rango